TL;DR
Turn quiet afternoons into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
A Sixty and Me report identifies potential, choice and purpose as three skills that may help people adapt to adversity. The article draws on interviews and personal observations, but it does not present a new study or establish that these skills produce the same outcomes for everyone.
Sixty and Me has published an article arguing that potential, choice and purpose can help people live well while facing hardship. The author bases the framework on interviews with people who experienced loss and other challenges, alongside personal observations; it is a reported perspective, not a new research study testing the three skills.
The article’s author describes interviewing people dealing with different challenges and losses to learn how they coped and continued with their lives. The project later became a book, Living Well Despite Adversity: Inspiration for Finding Renewed Meaning and Joy in Your Life. The report presents the three skills as themes drawn from those interviews, rather than as a formal clinical program or a guaranteed route to recovery.
Potential refers to questioning assumptions about what remains possible and using creativity and problem-solving to move beyond limiting beliefs. The article cites Gabriel Gordell, who traveled 3,000 miles in 99 days in a manual wheelchair. Gordell is quoted as saying, “It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.”
Choice is described as deciding how to respond to circumstances, even when the circumstances themselves cannot be changed. The report acknowledges that this is not easy and uses grief as an example. Sherri Mandell, reflecting on the murder of her son, says she works to “bless the person I have become” rather than mourn only the person she was before the loss.
How the Three Skills May Help
The framework matters because adversity can involve circumstances outside a person’s control, while their ways of responding may still change over time. The article’s emphasis is not that hardship can simply be overcome by attitude. Instead, it describes agency within difficult circumstances: identifying possibilities, making choices about the next step, and finding a reason to keep going.
The third skill, purpose, is presented as a source of direction through disruption, including ordinary life transitions as well as severe loss. The report quotes Julia Fox Garrison, who had a near-fatal stroke at age 37, saying, “What I need to do is impact someone in a positive way every single day.” Her statement illustrates how one interviewee describes purpose; it does not establish that the same approach will work for everyone.
For readers, the ideas offer a way to think about coping without promising that pain will disappear or that circumstances are unimportant. The article also stresses that resilience can be developed. That message may be encouraging, but the report does not measure the effects of practicing these skills or compare them with other forms of support.
Products Worth Considering
Withings BPM Vision Blood Pressure Monitor with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
Oura Ring 5 Smart Ring, Gold, Size 8
Bowflex SelectTech 840 Adjustable Kettlebell
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Interviews Behind the Framework
The report opens by challenging the assumption that happiness rises and falls in direct proportion to external circumstances. It discusses the idea of a hedonic set point—a habitual level of wellbeing to which people may return after positive or negative changes—and refers to research by psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky.
The article attributes a familiar “pie of happiness” model to Lyubomirsky: 50% genetic or hereditary factors, 10% circumstances and 40% intentional behavior, attitudes and beliefs. These percentages are presented in the source article as a broad account of influences on happiness. The supplied material does not provide the underlying study details, explain how the figures were derived, or establish that the proportions apply uniformly to individuals.
From there, the author connects personal interviews with the idea that resilience is a skillset that can grow, rather than a fixed trait. The supplied report does not name a specific resilience study supporting that claim. Its central contribution is a set of themes from people’s accounts, not a new test of the happiness model or a controlled evaluation of resilience training.
“It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.”
— Gabriel Gordell, as quoted in the Sixty and Me article
What the Article Does Not Establish
The report is based on interviews and the author’s observations; the supplied material does not give the number of people interviewed, a research method, or evidence that the three skills were assessed using a standardized measure. It is not clear how widely the interviewees’ experiences represent people facing adversity more broadly.
The article also does not show that potential, choice and purpose independently cause better wellbeing, or explain how their effects might differ by a person’s circumstances. Its happiness percentages are cited without enough information in the supplied source to evaluate the underlying research. The ideas should be read as a reflective framework, not as medical advice or a substitute for professional help when needed.
Applying the Ideas in Daily Life
The article does not announce a follow-up study, program or policy change. It closes by inviting readers to reflect on how they respond to challenges, what helps them build resilience, and whether they can identify purpose while living through pain. Those questions point toward personal reflection, rather than a defined next step or promised outcome.
For now, the report’s three themes remain guidance drawn from the author’s interviews: look for possibilities, consider which responses are available, and seek meaning that can provide direction. The source does not specify how readers should measure progress or when these approaches may be insufficient. Further evidence would be needed to establish how effective the framework is across different kinds of adversity.
Key Questions
What three skills does the article identify?
It identifies potential, choice and purpose as skills that may help people live well while facing adversity.
Is the report based on a new scientific study?
No. The source describes the author’s interviews and observations and does not report a new experiment or formal evaluation of the three skills.
What does the article mean by choice?
It means considering how to respond to difficult circumstances, even when a person cannot control what happened. The article also acknowledges that making choices during hardship can be difficult.
Does the article say circumstances do not affect happiness?
No. It argues that circumstances may influence happiness, while also presenting behavior, attitudes and beliefs as factors that can matter. The percentages it cites are not explained in enough detail in the supplied material to assess how they apply to individuals.
Source: sixtyandme.com
